Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
jesse.base.eth
Sk0rp.eth
BlindSquirrel
Corey0001 📉 📈
Cristian P.
SamZ
🫎 Scaply .ink .sand
Shuyao Kong
₿IRB
chosta.eth
一川drive 🔴Profile· Exemplary@serpinxbtOn Ethos
Serpin Taxt
2,005 reviews, 92% of them positive; 152.4K WHUF vouched for them by 114 people.92% positive · 2,005 reviews· 152.4K WHUF vouched· Influence factor 330, above 63% of accountsThe record
From 721 activities · Mar 2026Serpin is the founder and CEO of Ethos Network, a reputation and accountability platform built on-chain to combat sybils, scammers, and bad actors in crypto. A 12-year product leader with experience at Atlassian, HouseCallPro, and as an early hire at Message.io (YC W16), he brings deep expertise in product, security, identity verification, and fraud prevention. Known for hands-on community engagement, transparent communication, and uncompromising commitment to building trust through economic incentives and measurable reputation—he actively vouches for credible users, slashes bad actors with evidence, and iterates on Ethos mechanics based on real user behavior. Consistently praised for his work ethic, accessibility despite being CEO, and vision of making crypto more human-centered and trustworthy.
What people say
Received · 2KGiven · 1K“Behind $PUNK”Leaving this as future documentation that this is the guy who launched $PUNK https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/punkethcoin
on wifi · 1161· 6mo ago · neutral226
on wifi · 1161· 6mo ago · neutral226“Clear and blatant abuse of Ethos”I have plenty of reports of Steve and his group of friends / sybils clearly abusing the protocol. Slash incoming..
on Steve Charitoo · 1285· 8mo ago · negative151
on Steve Charitoo · 1285· 8mo ago · negative151“One too many slip ups”Billions has spawned seemingly out of nowhere, leaning heavily into products like Kaito to get their product promoted and talked about. They did a token sale ~8 months ago on Kaito and promised 0% unlock at TGE. They obviously immediately hit a wall with token listings having so much unlock (to yappers) on day 1, and had to change that. This obviously disappointed the community. I have talked about them and been both critical and supportive of them in the past - but it's clear their community is now fully working against them and they are heading in the wrong direction. I see the CEO all the time on my feed going on Korean talk shows, talking about how big of a problem they are solving, and all I see on any of the replies are complete slop comments. It's all talk, no product proof to be seen. Who is using this product? Everyone just wants the free token. It's the classic "Let's market and try to convince the market to be our exit liquidity" play that we've seen time and time again, and it's exhausting at this point. This product / "movement" exists solely to create a token, which has not proven to need to exist. The product at its core is a wrapper for identity services like fractal ID that they are using to verify humanness. After watching them continue to screw up comms (like we're going to TGE in Q1 and then missing that) (and we're not going to have 100% unlock at TGE) I think the nail in the coffin has been delivered.
on Billions Network · 683· 6mo ago · negative410
on Billions Network · 683· 6mo ago · negative410“Elaborate ruse - think twice about anyone who positively reviewed this project”I remember watching this project put out crazy marketing material and botting all of their socials. The token is trading at $75k now and got listed on sites like Kraken somehow. The project has all of the dumb bullshit components of a rug - lots of media, marketing and no substance. The website was shit and never actually worked. The fact that so many people supported it on Ethos is mind blowing.
on blackmirror_xp · 1513· 4mo ago · negative50
on blackmirror_xp · 1513· 4mo ago · negative50“Won our hackathon + excited to see them keep building”Nomos won our hackathon - the vibeathon - just about a month ago. We've been working with the team back and forth for the last few weeks and very excited to see what they ship :)
on Nomos · 1228· 7mo ago50
on Nomos · 1228· 7mo ago50“Ai generated inauthentic reviews”You wrote a review for someone you didn’t know. It wasn’t even accurate.
on Throw Kripto base.eth · 1224· 1y ago · negative50
on Throw Kripto base.eth · 1224· 1y ago · negative50
“This is the real Wazz backup account”I've confirmed it with him over Telegram, it's really him and he's using this as a backup for now until his main account gets restored
on WazzB · 1271· 1y ago50
on WazzB · 1271· 1y ago50“definitely wants your money, avoid at all costs”launched a bunch of projects that ultimately failed, holders lost money, continues to launch and promote garbage. most people know to avoid, new people probably don't.
on Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇 · 762· 1y ago · negative50
on Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇 · 762· 1y ago · negative50“Scam bullshit”Just posting absolute nonsense - I'm hiring someone! I'll pick someone from the replies - Look at this shitcoin I posted at $400k mcap! - Please buy my bags! - I called asteroid at $100k now it's $200m (unverified) This account is using you for exit liquidity
on zayed.eth · 851· 6mo ago · negative221
on zayed.eth · 851· 6mo ago · negative221“Not optimistic”I would categorize Standard Reserve as a complex protocol that has yet to have any solid proof of footing that it will work. They capitalized on hype / influencer marketing for their mint. They rewarded people who wrote long threads about why it was the future. IMO it is simply the wrong people in the trade. Yappers. Now we're seeing a DA from something like 1.25e for mint access, and that sort of greed taking over early on a project before the project launches is something I thought we moved passed as a network. An ohm fork, no matter how much it changed, will not survive in 2026. Ohm had retail normies and a significant influx of money. This will have neither of those and be a pvp blood bath The biggest feature is that it's too complex for anyone to understand. If you want exposure, your best bet is to wait 30 days and come back to it. It is much safer to play it this way - let the dev team / protocol prove that it's capable of working correctly - then size in.
on The Standard Reserve · 943· 36d ago · negative62
on The Standard Reserve · 943· 36d ago · negative62