Profile· Questionable@singh13gill88 On Ethos

Singh0805

2 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 2 reviews· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 2 activities · Jun 2026

Known for writing incentivized positive reviews in exchange for NFT mints and giveaways, inflating credibility scores for potentially risky collections. Returned after eight months of inactivity to post a paid review for CoinMemes as part of an apparent reputation scheme designed to funnel users toward private groups for liquidity extraction.

What people say

Received · 2 Given · 1

“Biased (incentivized) reviews, platform abuse”The account came back after 8 months inactivity only to drop the incentivized positive review for CoinMemes. See here: https://i.imgur.com/Rs1prNe.png The CoinMemes incentive: https://i.imgur.com/Eq1BQt3.png The reputation inflation scheme has only one purpose. Inflate score to seem more reputable -> funnel more people to the private group -> run up a liquidity extraction event in the private group. Related reviews: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/708705/ https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/708711/

Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°) · 1459· 4mo ago · negative7

“Abuses the Ethos system”Uses the protocol for profit-driven purposes, participates in GTD giveaways for free NFT mints by writing positive reviews. Inflates the credibility score of a potentially dangerous NFT collection, acting on selfish personal motives. The value of this participant's reviews is questionable.

ZET · 1537· 4mo ago · negative7

2 of 2 · most upvoted first