Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
jesse.base.eth
Sk0rp.eth
BlindSquirrel
Corey0001 📉 📈
Cristian P.
SamZ
🫎 Scaply .ink .sand
Wildcall
Shuyao Kong
sibzb
₿IRBProfile· Known@0xKharonOn Ethos
ZET
197 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 197 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accountsThe record
From 91 activities · Apr 2026ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that expose bad actors and XP farmers. Reviewers consistently praise their detailed research, mentorship, and commitment to ecosystem integrity—though some critics argue certain slashes rely on assumptions rather than on-chain proof. A respected community leader who runs the "From Zero" trading community and shares sharp market analysis across X and Telegram, valued for honest takes on projects, tokenomics, and privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.
What people say
Received · 197Given · 494“Fake influencer shilling memecoins + dubious projects”This account publishes posts dedicated to promoting dubious memecoins and projects, and hosts giveaways. All of this is done by artificially inflating engagement on its posts in order to attract a real viewer who will notice and buy what it's promoting. All posts are typical in their low quality and singular goal: regular calls to buy something or participate in something.
on nikmi Boss · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5
on nikmi Boss · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5“Dubious KOL with inflated engagement”Advertising unknown Solana memecoins that are dropping in price. Promoting obscure projects, fake audience under posts, AI-generated content. I recommend being extremely cautious about what this person says and recommends.
on DeFiNatti · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5
on DeFiNatti · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5“Solana Fake Influencer”Advertising unknown tokens, creating fake engagement under posts, and possibly fake token giveaways aimed at self-promotion and potentially promoting a malicious project.
on Very · 1179· 9mo ago · negative5
on Very · 1179· 9mo ago · negative5“Fake influencer + shilling for dubious projects and tokens”I urge the community to be cautious and analyze the engagement on this actor's posts. The tokens may be intentionally created for a rug pull, and project Discords or PC apps installed from them could potentially gain control over your private keys and wallets.
on Jhon Chain · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5
on Jhon Chain · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5“Fake engagement on Twitter, suspicious behavior”Incoming collaboration offers, obviously inflated and consistently high engagement, too many followers for someone no one knows. Twitter marks everyone replying to his posts as spam. None of the participants in his posts have Premium. This indicates a deliberately inflated fake reputation to create the appearance of a trusted influencer.
on BA Movilidad · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5
on BA Movilidad · 1185· 9mo ago · negative5“Fake PR manager and influencer”Almost all engagement is artificially inflated, + there have been repeated incoming offers to contact via PM. Frequent appearances in CT. My review is meant to protect inattentive crypto-enthusiasts.
on Robinhood Girl · 1169· 9mo ago · negative5
on Robinhood Girl · 1169· 9mo ago · negative5“Important update. Switching the handle from the project name to a personal profile”Some time after my first review, this account changed its Twitter handle and username, flooding its feed with retweets. However, there is data confirming the topic of my first review and replies from other Twitter users. My first review: [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/612177/systematically-engages-in-creating-memetokens-and-enriches-itself] Search on Twitter using the old name: [https://x.com/search?q=AiShiba_Arb&src=typeahead_click] 2 examples of replies from other participants: [https://x.com/alfariz_anggi/status/1999143102808797426] [https://x.com/0xcryptup/status/1999463251499991366]
on Gbade · 1173· 9mo ago · negative5
on Gbade · 1173· 9mo ago · negative5“Careless Attitude Towards the Community and Suppression of Its Members”Oswyo is a moderator of the TEN protocol, but his powers extend far beyond merely maintaining order on the Discord server. Post: [https://x.com/SlyFox_blet/status/1992263464321159542] Everything below is a textual copy of the post for recording on the blockchain: Author: [https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/SlyFox_blet] @tenprotocol[https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/tenprotocol] is not about technology - TEN is the biggest scam and betrayal of its community in my entire crypto career. In this thread, I’ll show how my team and I worked with TEN’s co-founders for over 3 years, and how they took away all the tokens we were owed right before TGE [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XMnZ3WgAAbGFn?format=png&name=small] It all started 3 years ago. We found TEN when it was still called Obscuro, and [https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/0xCais] communicated with us kindly. We decided to help the project in exchange for tokens, because we believed in it — not for a salary We built a faucet bot for their Discord testnet, and it worked for more than a year until TEN decided to replace it with their own bot. Ours was constantly improved, had unique features, and the team loved it. They even promised to include a mention of our team in their emails [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XrNS5WMAAKM-2?format=jpg&name=medium] We also created many animated videos about the project, along with artwork, memes, stickers, animations, and several character concepts for the team. Here’s one of the videos: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXCrX4d39uM] Points were awarded for completed work, but we noticed that our complex videos earned only slightly more than someone else’s simple tweet. We raised this issue, and I even had a call with another TEN co-founder, [https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/Gavin_Chain] Where we explained why fair evaluation matters and why a tweet cannot be worth only 5× less than a video that takes a whole team 3 weeks to produce. After this call, we did get additional points for our contribution. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6Xs6puW8AAc-LD?format=png&name=900x900] Unfortunately, by that time most community management had already been delegated to the moderator Oswy, who handled the point system (he early promised up our rewards 5×) He became angry at us for trying to bring fairness to the system and began threatening to remove all our roles and tokens if we continued. @0xCais promised to look into it, but ultimately dropped the issue. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XtU8_WEAAuG91?format=jpg&name=medium] Then began the 2-year series of TGE delays. We kept contributing to TEN: we helped build a news website, joined calls with the developers, and even set up a node, buying a server for it. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XtcaZXQAABWBr?format=png&name=small] In May of this year, the checker was released. I saw 203k tokens allocated to me and over 180k tokens to my team. Two core members, https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/0xBhavB and https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/0xJba, even congratulated us. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6Xtfy8XkAA5x3t?format=png&name=900x900] Then strange things started happening. In July, when I asked again about the TGE date, Oswy removed my OG Musketeer role. Later, the team held a meme contest where we submitted many strong entries — but obvious bots won, accounts with no tweets and created recently. When my friend asked Oswy about it, he said it was too hard to review all tweets and choose quality work. When my friend offered to help him, his Musketeer role was removed as well. Then my role was removed again, even though I wasn’t even online. I tried to find out if this would affect our tokens. Remember, at that point the project was already 2 years overdue for TGE. @0xCais assured us that our tokens would remain. It made sense — the snapshot had already been taken, and we had seen our tokens in the checker. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6Xt5QpXkAAkQUJ?format=jpg&name=medium] Then, on October 10, wrapped TEN tokens arrived in our wallets, but 50k–75k tokens were missing — exactly the amount tied to the removed roles. After 2 weeks of back-and-forth, the team sent me to Oswy with a “compromise”: to receive only 50k tokens for the Musketeer role [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XuJqNWQAActxT?format=png&name=900x900] Oswy, in turn, said he would take all our tokens if we didn’t stop asking questions. Just think about it — they threatened to take away tokens that were already sitting in our wallets. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XuSYTW4AA027s?format=jpg&name=medium] And yesterday they took everything. In the checker we are now all “Not Eligible,” despite our enormous work and despite the tokens we previously saw in our wallets. The team doesn’t care and ignores all messages. [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XwbhyWgAA6t7N?format=png&name=900x900] Other Musketeers also lost their roles and their tokens. I’m asking for help spreading this information and hopefully resolving the situation. The project left us with nothing. As of now, TEN is the biggest scam of my entire crypto career. [https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/therosieum] is it your marketing point? [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6XwfX1W4AA2sLe?format=jpg&name=medium]
on oswyo.eth · 1193· 11mo ago · negative5
on oswyo.eth · 1193· 11mo ago · negative5“Ideologically and conceptually engaged”This review pertains to a person I don’t know personally, but I’ve noticed their activity on Ethos. They came to my attention about two weeks ago. It’s clear that this person is genuinely interested in Ethos based on the concept itself, the ideology of ethics, and actively participates in maintaining discussions both in the comments in the marketplace section and in EIPs. At the time I wrote this review, they had zero incoming interactions, which may signal an issue where active participants on the platform go unnoticed, despite their impartial use of the features and contributions to development. I hope my review serves as a small testament to the fact that not everything today is as bleak as it seems. I appreciate he unbiased approach to Web3, as it reflects the personal quality of an enthusiast who has built, and helped build, what hundreds or millions of people in crypto use today.
on LADYGIN · 1331· 12mo ago5
on LADYGIN · 1331· 12mo ago5“Poor Attitude Toward the Community”Inspect is a browser extension designed to provide more information about projects and other entities in Web3, similar to Ethos extensions. But the team constantly made decisions that caught their supporters off guard. Ultimately, after making numerous promises that engaged the community, they developed quite deceitful mechanics towards the end, closer to TGE. They intentionally caused rejection from further activities in community programs. The token has been listed on exchanges, yet the community has still not been rewarded, and social accounts are silent.
on Inspect · 1301· 12mo ago · negative5
on Inspect · 1301· 12mo ago · negative5“The SOFTRUG is priced at 100 million”I first came across Human Protocol about three years ago through the Coinlist tokensale. The roots of this project trace back to Hcaptcha [https://docs.humanprotocol.org/hub/human-tech-docs/architecture/components/annotation-tools/hcaptcha], which many know through Discord or other services where it is in demand. Human Captcha is likely the second-largest captcha and anti-bot service after Google Captcha. However, the problem seems to be that the team isn't generating enough profit from this service, and they decided to seize their opportunity when everyone was excited about token sales on Coinlist. They created their startup idea literally on the fly and reached out to Coinlist representatives to organize a tokensale. The token price was outrageous, the fundraising goal was doubled, and ultimately, they raised 50-70 million. Have you heard anything about this project today? I doubt it. The team is quietly and calmly pressing the neutral pedal and rolling along to avoid notice. I don't have data, but it's likely that all this money has long been divided among the key team members, and each of them is quite the DeFi degenerate today. It's surprising, isn't it? You could say that a large company, a competitor to Google in one of its niches, is tempted by the crypto hype and creates a fictitious startup with front people. Source: https://cryptorank.io/ico/human-protocol
on HUMAN Protocol 🧬 · 1203· 1y ago · negative5
on HUMAN Protocol 🧬 · 1203· 1y ago · negative5“The Penguin from the Abstract Crew”We all know that Pengu is closely associated with Abstract, but few realize that this guy was made for it. Dmitro is probably one of the few who has been with Abstract from the very beginning. I remember how he wanted to snag the Blue Pengu collection in Telegram, and he succeeded. This guy is incredibly fanatical. I would call him an OG of the modern gaming Web3 industry, and his knowledge and experience are something everyone involved in GameFi and abstraction-type projects would aspire to acquire. While I personally am not a fan of this project, I cannot overlook the fact that many people are passionate about it. On Ethos, its score is high, and among my circle, there are plenty who have spent countless hours on streams and games.
on penguin1 · 1298· 1y ago16
on penguin1 · 1298· 1y ago16