Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

What people say

Received · 703 Given · 0

“Bad community management”I believed Eclipse had good intentions but they proved not to. This is not about the poor airdrop they did to community, it is about how they treated the community for complaining. They promoted violent reactions whenever someone says something against the project and even KOLs for being KOLs.

Super Sub - #14🏆 · 1324· 1y ago · negative14

“bad”I don't even want to speak for this profile, the team didn't treat its active users very well, although before that they said something completely different, so why is this a bad profile, if only there was a possibility for me to block it

StanixD · 1197· 1y ago · negative14

“A Shady Mess of a Chain I Regret Touching”I got into EclipseFND when they were hyping their Solana-Ethereum mix, but wow, what a total bust. Their ecosystem is straight-up trash—big promises about a cool roadmap, but it’s all empty talk. The $ECLIPSE airdrop was a scam; Alucard, their shady leader, gave tokens to his pals instead of the community who worked for it, like 0xiprofit called out. This guy’s a jerk, bad-mouthing other projects and proving he’s just in it for himself, wrecking any trust in Eclipse. Their posts talk up community stuff and dApps, but the chain’s dead—nothing’s happening, as chekanboy said with their “TurboTap” scams and team nonsense. It’s all fake hype, no real action or users. I wasted my time on this junk, and it’s taught me to steer clear of shady projects run by folks like Alucard who care more about looking cool than building anything decent.

Jay.Base.Eth · 1246· 1y ago · negative14

“A Disappointing Chapter for the Solana Ecosystem”Many people believed Eclipse would spark a revolution in the Solana network, but the reality was far from the promise. The poor handling of its airdrop was only one part of the problem. From unclear communication to weak execution and lack of real community engagement, the project failed to deliver on the expectations it built. Features that were marketed as groundbreaking either arrived half-baked or did not meet the standards set by other leading projects. Instead of becoming a driving force for innovation, Eclipse ended up losing momentum and trust, leaving the community with a sense of wasted potential.

shozef · 1192· 1y ago · negative14

“Dead chain”Sofisticated and tricky blockchain with zero utility.

Ravenor · 1345· 1y ago · negative14

“Good Project, Terrible Community Lead, Worst Airdrop”A disappointing airdrop despite being a great project and the terrible Community Lead behind it.

1.3 Multijet · 1313· 1y ago · neutral14

“A powerful Dapp builder”Eclipse, a free, open-source IDE, simplifies coding with smart features like auto-suggestions, error detection, and debugging. Backed by the Eclipse Foundation and funded by 350+ members like IBM, it’s customizable via plugins. Layer 2 tools (PDE, JDT) boost flexibility and productivity. Despite a learning curve and potential slowdowns, its community support, cost-free access, and project management make it a top choice for developers seeking an efficient, versatile coding environment.

Vi · 1258· 1y ago14

“Useless project”After burning my gas fee and yapping about them continuously I end up not being eligible for there airdrop and it pains after months of putting in work

investor ogbaga 🟠🔱 · 1269· 1y ago · negative14

“Eclipse — All Optics, No Orbit”Eclipse had the appropriate buzz from the outside thanks to its well-known brands, audacious claims, and sophisticated branding. On the inside, though, it feels hollow. delays, imprecise plans, and minimal community involvement. You eventually need substance because hype can only get you so far. And Eclipse is not meeting expectations at the moment.

Azolay · 1287· 1y ago · negative14

“Terrible execution”The idea wasnt bad at all. Solana speed with EVM compatibility, but the execution was terrible even with almost infinite funding. Someone took the money and had fun playing with the userbase.

Robapuros.eth · 1341· 10mo ago · negative17

“What a diseaster !”I was very Involved in this L2 chain, everything was promising. But after TGE the team broke appart, and also the community. To bad !

Julien.ip 🦇 · 1271· 10mo ago · negative17

“A story as old as time in crypto”another VC-backed scam, what's there to write about? lol, lmao even

Amiralek · 1359· 10mo ago · negative17

‹ Back168 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›