Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

What people say

Received · 703 Given · 0

“Scam network”EclipseFND is a deceptive network that lured in many users with various tactics. Its scammer founder encouraged NFT purchases and implemented an uneven token distribution among users, ultimately losing all credibility. The founder has since gone on the run.

bit · 1235· 1y ago · negative9

“Eclipse could have been great”I used this blockchain several months, i liked its speed and smoothness, some apps within Eclipse are good, but the majority are more of the same. The core team disappointed the community, and i think there is no coming back from that.

Thomas C. · 1222· 1y ago · neutral9

“Poor Execution”started off in a good way, but the team had a terrible and poor execution alon the way and project went off course.

Lejupiter · 1273· 1y ago · negative9

“Failed svm project?”They try to build a solana evm but couldnt get a fascinating app to attract users organically. They could not manage the community properly and ended distributing airdrop poorly. Eager to see whats next for them after tge

HimaNii · 1300· 1y ago · negative9

“Great Tech, but Bad Execution”Eclipse honestly came in with impressive tech, aiming to bridge ecosystems like Ethereum and Solana. But the founder habit of talking down on competitors and overpromising before launch built huge expectations the project couldn’t fully meet.

𝑾𝒉𝒊𝒕𝒆.𝒔𝒖𝒊.𝒉𝒍 · 1272· 1y ago · negative9

“hayal kırıklığı”maalesef beklentilerin çok altında kaldı. hele ASC yatırımım ve boşa çıkan güvenim benim için büyük tecrübe oldu

ümit · 1323· 1y ago · negative9

“In the start eclipse was a promising project.But the way they treated there core community who held ASC NF was bad!”

The Pennypacker · 1266· 1y ago · negative9

“When Hype Meets Disappointment”They promised a launch that would reward early believers, a community-first vibe and instead, a lot of people ended up feeling misunderstood and overlooked. From what I’ve seen on here, even some folks who’d been supporting the project from day one felt buried by unclear eligibility criteria and silent decision-making behind the scenes. It’s not the itself that hurt it’s the fact that many of us watched quietly, hoping our loyalty would count for something… and then it didn’t. Then there’s the checker rollout some news outlets and users started praising it as the moment of truth, but the hype crash landed into confusion as soon as click throughs began. Folks were trying to figure out who even qualified, and the whole process felt murky. It looked more like a puzzle than a reward. No one likes to be kept guessing, especially when you’ve been active not farming random tasks, but genuinely contributing. And perhaps the worst part? Some heard that team members couldn’t claim despite being employers, a move meant to reduce insider advantage but for a lot of us, it felt like too little, too late. The problem wasn’t the block on insiders it was that the distribution just didn’t land right. Airdrops are supposed to build trust, not break it. Unfortunately, this one stung more than it uplifted.

N1ghtStar · 1331· 1y ago · negative9

“bad project”

KEERIKKADAN · 1251· 1y ago · negative9

“Ambitious Vision, But Lacking Transparency”@EclipseFND clearly aims to position itself at the forefront of modular blockchain innovation, but the communication often feels overly curated and light on substance. While the tech promises are bold, followers are left wanting more clarity on progress, roadmap details, and real-world traction. There’s potential in the project’s direction, but without more open dialogue and consistent updates, it risks creating distance between the team and the community it’s trying to build.

Majfza · 1237· 1y ago · negative9

“Big scam”Forgetting the airdrop disaster, Alucard is a toxic person who just wants people to blindly follow him and nod along every time he says something stupid It's a project that will disappear before the end of the year, and that's what they deserve

Alex Paz · 1230· 1y ago · negative9

tom 🎒🔴💊DOJO3.ink · 1213· 1y ago · negative9

‹ Back312 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›